Cases 21 - 30 of 39
JACCARD v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2014cv07535
Plaintiff:
MARILYN JACCARD
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, SEA BRIGHT BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRETT FRIEDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRIS v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 3:2014cv03726
Plaintiff:
PETER INGRIS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA , FIRST DATA CORPORATION and FITZSIMMONS REPORTING
Cross_claimant:
FITZSIMMONS REPORTING and BANK OF AMERICA
Cross_defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA , FIRST DATA CORPORATION and FITZSIMMONS REPORTING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAHOOD V. TD BANK, ET AL
as 2:2013cv05364
Defendant:
TD BANK, COLUMBIA BANK, BERGEN PASSAIC & HUDSON COUNTIES and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LAHOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
REDFORD et al v. ABRUTYN et al
as 2:2011cv05130
Plaintiff:
SAPHYRE REDFORD, DANIELLE BITON and CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON
Defendant:
MORGAN MELHUISH ABRUTYN, ED DWECK, KATHLEEN CARLA ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
