Cases 21 - 30 of 652
Davis v. Richmond County Marshals Office et al
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Davis
Defendant:
Richmond County Marshals Office, Officer Brantley, Officer Billman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hames v. Richmond County Marshals Office et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Rasheeda E. Hames
Defendant:
Richmond County Marshals Office, Officer Brantley, Officer Billman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooker v. Obbissit et al
as 1:2023cv05928
Plaintiff:
Maurice Darrell Hooker
Defendant:
Michael D. Obbissit, Terra Rollins, Linda Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Inman v. Steinberg et al
as 1:2023cv05903
Plaintiff:
Devonia Inman
Defendant:
James Steinberg, Charles Whitley, Jeffrey Roesler and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Burton et al v. Ward et al
as 1:2023cv05836
Plaintiff:
Cedric Burton, Jasman Maxwell and Amber Griffin
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Victor Walker, Raymond Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Brown v. Raymonville-Watson et al
as 1:2023cv05681
Plaintiff:
Maurice Brown
Defendant:
Frances Raymonville-Watson and Nelvin Wilder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
