Cases 21 - 30 of 47
HILL v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2015cv04142
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DEREK HILL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, FREE LIBRARY OF PHILA and PARKWAY CENTRAL LIBRARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EL v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2015cv04038
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL MILLER EL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA and CITY OF PHILA POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LYNCH v. THE CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2015cv03064
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYNCH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA., THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNA., THE PHILA. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANGJELI v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2015cv01566
Plaintiff:
SUZANA VANGJELI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, FREE LIBRARY and HR'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DANIHEL v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT et al
as 2:2014cv06880
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DANIHEL
Defendant:
OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, US HUD, US SENATOR PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYNCH v. THE CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2014cv04414
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYNCH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA., THE PHILA TRAFFIC COURT and THE PHILA PARKING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON et al v. CROSS et al
as 2:2013cv05955
Plaintiff:
JERRY K. LAWSON, HIANIF A. LAWSON, CRYSTAL K. LAWSON and others
Defendant:
SHANDA CROSS, THOMAS MARTINKA, THOMAS DONNYELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER-BAKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05433
Plaintiff:
JAMIL BUTLER-BAKER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CITY OF PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM , MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BADGER v. CITY OF PHILA./ OFFICE OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT
as 2:2013cv04936
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS A. BADGER, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA./ OFFICE OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
