Cases 21 - 30 of 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Blassingame v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2022cv03261
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Blassingame
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., Stanley Elligan, Lt. Richard Phillips and others
Blassingame v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2022cv03251
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Blassingame
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., Stanley Elligan, Lt. Richard Phillips and others
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, T-MOBILE, T-MOBILE FINANCIAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Canning v. Jackson et al
as 6:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
John Canning
Defendant:
Shirley Jackson, Fnu Olowsky, Trevonza Bobbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Lall et al
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Raymond Remell Richardson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge J. Jessy Lall, Sergeant Francious, M.P. Officer Strout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gregory et al v. Main Street Renewal LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
Destiny Myesha Gregory and DMG We Will Never Faulter LLC
Defendant:
Main Street Renewal LLC, SFR ASSET Management LLC, RH Partners Owner Co LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 875 Public Buildings & Property: Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
