Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Stout v. City of Antioch et al
as 4:2020cv08370
Plaintiff:
Robert Stout
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Officer Eric A. McManus, Officer Caeser E. Tanguma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2020cv06535
Defendant:
City of Antioch and Antioch Police Department
Plaintiff:
Troy King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. City of Antioch
as 3:2020cv04429
Defendant:
City of Antioch
Plaintiff:
mark owens jordan and Mark Owens Jordan doing business as Jordan & Associates doing business as RE/MAX Preferred Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03821
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02764
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gattis v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2020cv02693
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Morteza Amiri and others
Plaintiff:
Vance Gattis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Currie v. Moraga et al
as 4:2019cv07540
Defendant:
Antioch Police Department, City of Antioch, Officer Mark Moraga and others
Plaintiff:
Tanicia Currie and Tanicia Shamay Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rocha v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2019cv07312
Defendant:
Kristopher Kint, City of Antioch, Zechariah Matis and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Rocha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. Mortimer et al
as 3:2018cv07391
Defendant:
James Alexander, Barry Grove, City of Antioch and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Banks, Alexix Avalos, Alexis Avalos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vieira v. County of Sacramento et al
as 3:2018cv05431
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Joseph Zalec, Sacramento County and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas K Vieira and Nicholas K. Vieira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
