Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Moffie v. City of Youngstown, et al
as 4:2013cv02660
Plaintiff:
Sam Moffie
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, Youngstown City Council and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Johnson v. Carlos Eggleston, et al
as 13-3446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLOS EGGLESTON, and Individually, CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN and JOHN DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE
Bratton v. City of Youngstown et al
as 4:2013cv00346
Plaintiff:
Edward Bratton
Defendant:
City of Youngstown , Russell Davis , Richard Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Scott v. City of Youngstown et al
as 4:2012cv02992
Plaintiff:
Donald Scott
Defendant:
City of Youngstown , Rod Foley and Dana Lantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v City of Youngstown, Ohio et al
as 4:2012cv01137
Plaintiff:
Desiree Johnson and Doretha Weston
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, Ohio , Kevin Mercer and Patrick Mulligan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. City of Youngstown, Ohio et al
as 4:2011cv01635
Plaintiff:
Desiree Johnson
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, Ohio , Jimmy F. Hughes , Kevin Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmings v. City of Youngstown
as 4:2011cv01555
Plaintiff:
Cory Timmings
Defendant:
City of Youngstown , City of Youngstown Police Department , Philip Chance, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Eggleston et al
as 4:2011cv00822
Plaintiff:
Gerald Johnson
Defendant:
Carlos Eggleston , City of Youngstown and John Does One through Five
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
