Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv04787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
COLES et al v. CARLINI et al
as 1:2010cv06132
Plaintiff:
JAMES COLES , LOUIS C. DEGAILLER and JOSEPH BALLINGER
Defendant:
NICHOLAS CARLINI, GREGORY MANUEL, PAULA T. DOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. TOWN OF MORRISTOWN et al
as 2:2010cv04706
Plaintiff:
FRANCINE COLE
Defendant:
TOWN OF MORRISTOWN, DONALD CRESITELLO, TIM DOUGHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMAS v. COLE HAAN HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05958
Plaintiff:
COREY THOMAS
Defendant:
COLE HAAN HOLDINGS, INC., RAY BRODECHERE, NIKE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BURNS v. COLE et al
as 1:2009cv02794
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Defendant:
JUEL E. COLE, COX, BURLINGTON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
The Estate of Bevelyn D. Cole et al v. AHS Hospital Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00944
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Bevelyn D. Cole and Gwendolyn Cole-Hoover
Defendant:
AHS HOSPITAL CORPORATION and NEWARK BETH ISREAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WEST v. NATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICE (AMERICROPS) et al
as 2:2008cv06041
Plaintiff:
TOYA V. WEST
Defendant:
NATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICE (AMERICROPS), NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, NICOLSON FOUNDATION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
