Cases 21 - 30 of 37
JONES v. THE COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2014cv06381
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF ESSEX , ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT , JAMES COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CROSBY v. DOHERTY et al
as 2:2013cv04009
Plaintiff:
LEONARD CROSBY
Defendant:
K. DOHERTY, MICHAEL RICCI, JERRY ALSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODALL et al v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2012cv04963
Plaintiff:
SHAHEEDAH WOODALL and KHADIJAH WOODALL
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, ATLANTIC CITY POLICE CHIEF ERNEST JUBILEE, SYED SHAH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MULLER et al v. MAENZA et al
as 2:2010cv06110
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M. MULLER , DANIEL J. PISZCZATOSKI , JOHN M. DRAKE and others
Defendant:
PHILIP J. MAENZA, RUDOLPH A. FILKO, EDWARD A. JEREJIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
COOK v. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv00409
Plaintiff:
ANDRA COOK
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY and THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
