Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Cortez v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv08084
Plaintiff:
William Cortez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles Sheriffs Department and Does
Mark Anthony Pascascio v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv03767
Defendant:
Leroy Baca, Deputy Ryan Clarke, County of Los Angeles Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Pascascio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Norman v. County of Los Angeles Sheriff Department
as 2:2014cv09207
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
John Norman
Nolan Christopher Hillis v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv07186
Defendant:
Ajufoh, Ajufoh, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Christopher Hillis
Karl Masek v. Los Angeles Metro Transportati, et al
as 14-55950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL MASEK
Defendant - Appellee:
LOS ANGELES METRO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, BOARD OF SECRETARY, MARK LAROSA, Hearing Officer and others
Thomas Threw v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 14-55560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS J. THREW
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LEROY D. BACA, Sheriff of Los Angeles County in his official capacity and others
Sumit Ghosh, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 14-55233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUMIT GHOSH, individually and as Trustee of the Sumit Ghosh Revocable Trust Dated 5/17/04 (Deceased) and ANOSUYA DATTA, Individually and as Trustee of the Datta Family Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Karl Masek v. Los Angeles Metro Transportation Authority et al
as 2:2014cv00798
Defendant:
Board of Secretary, County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Masek
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
