Cases 21 - 30 of 308
LUMZY v. DOE 1-19 et al
as 3:2023cv22581
Plaintiff:
ACQUINETTA LUMZY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-19 and JANE DOE 20-21
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Santana v. Waters et al
as 3:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Santana
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Williams, Sheriff T.K. Waters, Officer M.A. Morel-Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Baker County et al
as 3:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Baker County, Baker County Corrections Management Corporation, Chair Sharon Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
CABRAL v. EAST COAST BOBCAT SERVICE, INC.
as 0:2023cv60893
Plaintiff:
CHLOE CABRAL
Defendant:
EAST COAST BOBCAT SERVICE INC, a Florida Corporation, and John Does 1-5 doing business as East Coast Maintenance & Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
The Estate of Joshua Swann v. Clay County Florida et al
as 3:2023cv00471
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Joshua Swann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newkirk v. Fishback, et al
as 3:2023cv00464
Petitioner:
Carla Newkirk
Respondent:
Robert Fishback, John Guy, Rhasha Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Boeckman et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Blair Lanston Wright
Defendant:
Laura Boeckman, Fulvio Joseph Gentili, Robert R. Julian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. MOODY et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
BLAIR LANSTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
ASHLEY BROOKE MOODY, FULVIO JOSEPH GENTILI, ROBERT R JULIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
