Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Clyden v. Irwin et al
as 5:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Justuce Clyden
Defendant:
Grant Irwin, Jr, Irwin Auto Co and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ewell et al v. Clark et al
as 6:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Neville Ewell, II, Donta Davis and Samuel Washington
Defendant:
Shannon Clark, Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority, Lino Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terry et al v. City of Oklahoma City Oklahoma et al
as 5:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Sincere Terry, Mia Hogsett, Tyreke Baker and others
Defendant:
City of Oklahoma City Oklahoma, Thomas Vannort, David Prater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawzipta v. Kaw Nation Tribal Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv00326
Defendant:
Jim Sherron, Kaw Nation Tribal Police Department, City of Blackwell and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Wedel Hawzipta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hammett v. Pontotoc County Sheriff et al
as 6:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Janice Hammett
Defendant:
Pontotoc County Sheriff and Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padron v. Glancy et al
as 5:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Padron
Defendant:
Chet Glancy, Sammy Weygand, Dustin Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawrence v. Poteau, City of et al
as 6:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Lyle Lawrence
Defendant:
Poteau, City of and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes et al v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2021cv01094
Plaintiff:
Jackie Hughes, Angela Hawkins, Danielle Daniel and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Justin Brown, Ed Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
