Cases 21 - 30 of 72
TOLLOIVER et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS TOLLOIVER and JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
SEAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEILD v. SPEISER et al
as 2:2014cv06965
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NEILD
Defendant:
JOHN SPEISER, ANTHONY PAROTTI, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALOY v. WALKER et al
as 2:2014cv06964
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MALOY
Defendant:
JEFFREY WALKER, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-25, POLICE OFFICER JANE DOES 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADER v. POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-25 et al
as 2:2014cv06963
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MADER
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-25, POLICE OFFICER JANE DOES 1-25 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLINS v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv06836
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROLLINS
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEWTON v. MCCLOSKY et al
as 2:2014cv06799
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NEWTON and LUZ GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCCLOSKY, MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMERS v. ELO et al
as 2:2014cv06609
Plaintiff:
JAMES SIMMERS
Defendant:
JAMES ELO, MIKE KELLY, TIMOTHY DEERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv06236
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, MICHAEL SPICER, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY and others
Plaintiff:
CHIHEAN JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTEO v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv05829
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MATTEO
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
