Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02844
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
STRZOK v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2019cv02367
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FBI DIRECTOR CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
PETER STRZOK
Petitioner:
DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
Intervenor:
LISA PAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
CARTER v. DIRECTOR, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2019cv00649
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff:
DIANNE MICHELE CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOTTEN, TREY TREADWELL, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Plaintiff:
AZAEL D. PERALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMBREY v. DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00188
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNKNOWN PERSONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J.R. EMBREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv02475
Plaintiff:
D.B. and LOUIS A. BANKS
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FORMER DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YUN v. CITY OF STROUDSBURG et al
as 1:2018cv01194
Plaintiff:
GLORIA SUN JUNG YUN
Defendant:
CITY OF STROUDSBURG, CHIEF DIRECTOR, CYNTHIA TALAMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. J. EDGE HOOVER BUILDING FBI DIRECTOR
as 1:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN
Defendant:
J. EDGE HOOVER BUILDING FBI DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
