Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Aviles v. Cooper Square Realty, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02584
Plaintiff:
Erlinda P. Aviles
Defendant:
Cooper Square Realty, Inc., Homeland Security (John/Jane Doe), United States Department of Health & Human Services (Jane Doe) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mosca v. 472 Gramatan Owners, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv01084
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mosca , Jr.
Defendant:
472 Gramatan Owners, Inc., Gramatan Owners, Inc. Board Of Directors;, Paul Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kugler v. Potter
as 1:2011cv00648
Defendant:
Postmaster General Patrick R Donahue and John E. Potter
Plaintiff:
Raina Kugler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05318
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Burton v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2010cv09550
Plaintiff:
Ann Burton
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki, Ginette Joubert, Francisca Go and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramos v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv04466
Defendant:
P.O. "Jane Doe" and "John Doe" 1-10 and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Donahue Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donahue v. Seirmarco
as 7:2010cv02207
Plaintiff:
Alfred J Donahue
Defendant:
James Seirmarco
Counter_claimant:
James Seirmarco
Counter_defendant:
James Seirmarco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
