Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Fields v. Tulsa Police Department, City of et al
as 4:2010cv00175
Plaintiff:
Ernie Fields
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department, City of, Thomas F Fees, Bennett E Forrest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Snider v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Karen Snider
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of, Brad Henry, Jane Doe Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. Rayl et al
as 4:2009cv00800
Plaintiff:
James Fields, Jr
Defendant:
James Brian Rayl, Pete Silva, Tulsa Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Oklahoma Department of Labor et al
as 5:2007cv00831
Plaintiff:
Laurie Allen
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Labor, Lloyd Fields and Lloyd Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Andrews et al v. Holmes et al
as 4:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Andrews, Nancy M Rothschild, Charles D Spencer and others
Defendant:
Jerome A Holmes, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
