Cases 21 - 30 of 130
A.R.L. v. City of Fullerton et al
as 8:2021cv00929
Defendant:
City of Fullerton, a municipal entity
Plaintiff:
A. R. L., a minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00471
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv02391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Feliciano, v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv10033
Defendant:
C.O.s John and Jane Does, 1-8, C.O. Nicholas Prensa, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Madeline Feliciano,
Interested Party:
New York State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hector Hernandez et al v. City of Fullerton et al
as 8:2020cv01747
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 50, individually and as peace officers, inclusive, Corporal Jonathan Ferrell, City of Fullerton and others
Plaintiff:
Hector Hernandez, H. R. and C. H.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
David Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lourdes Toman et al v. Jerry Glomboske et al
as 8:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Herrera, Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Toman, Antonio Paredes and Alan Castro
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11838
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
