Cases 21 - 30 of 110
Holmes v. Department of Homeless Services, et al.
as 1:2019cv08962
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Holmes
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland, Department of Homeless Services, The Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Gurvey v. Garry et al
as 1:2019cv04739
Defendant:
Luis Gonzalez, Lauren Holmes, Squitieri & Fearon, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Amy R. Gurvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. County of Montgomery et al
as 1:2019cv00617
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #3, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brennan et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv02054
Defendant:
City of New York, John/Jane Does 1-5 and Captain William Tobin
Plaintiff:
Gary Realmuto, Tivon Forman, Latoya Holmes-McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holmes v. Dollinger et al
as 1:2019cv02023
Defendant:
Edward J. Farrell, Isidore Dollinger, Abraham Gellinof and others
Plaintiff:
Winston Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sx
Holmes v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv01628
Defendant:
Checkpoint Fluidic Systems International, Ltd., City of Kenner (Louisiana), Detective Rodrigo Caballero and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00620
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv06791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
