Cases 21 - 30 of 72
MITCHELL v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE et al
as 2:2016cv09143
Plaintiff:
LEROY MITCHELL
Defendant:
CITY OF EAST ORANGE , S. THORNE, D. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE et al v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2016cv08308
Plaintiff:
PAMELA WHITE , ESTATE OF PHILLIP GEORGE WHITE , IYONNA HANNAH and others
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND, TIMOTHY CODISPOTI, LOUIS PLATANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
STOVALL v. GRAZIOLI et al
as 1:2016cv04839
Plaintiff:
FLAVIA STOVALL
Defendant:
JAMES GRAZIOLI , LOUIS NARVAEZ , GILBERTO VELASQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KAHN v. BURLINGTON CITY et al
as 1:2016cv00669
Plaintiff:
STEVEN S KAHN
Defendant:
BURLINGTON CITY , BURLINGTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , ANTHONY WALACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2016cv00265
Plaintiff:
RAHMON RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK , NEIL LAURIE , ROWE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
AYLER et al v. WOODBRIDGE CENTER MALL et al
as 2:2015cv03645
Plaintiff:
SHAQUITA AYLER , MANIRAH HARRIS and JASMINE GORDON
Defendant:
WOODBRIDGE CENTER MALL, ANTHONY VASTA , ADILSON VIERA and others
Cross_claimant:
ADILSON VIERA and ANTHONY VASTA
Cross_defendant:
ABC CORP. THROUGH XYZ, R. APTAKER, SHAQUITA AYLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
