Cases 21 - 30 of 56
TULLO v. TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN et al
as 2:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
MARIA TULLO
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN , WEEHAWKEN POLICE DEPARTMENT , ROBERT JACOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWTON et al v. TOWNSHIP OF UNION et al
as 2:2015cv06228
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON and ANDREA NEWTON
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UNION , THE UNION POLICE DEPT. , DOE WITTEVRONGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. CRUZ et al
as 3:2015cv02951
Plaintiff:
MACK TYLER
Defendant:
JACQUELINE CRUZ, LAWRENCE ROSSI, LEE ACUFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRUCHAN v. NUTLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv00324
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TRUCHAN
Defendant:
NUTLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT , OFFICER ANDREW VAN DORN , PATROLMAN JOSEPH STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OKAFOR v. STARGHILL et al
as 2:2014cv02690
Plaintiff:
REGINA U. OKAFOR
Defendant:
CATHERINE STARGHILL, KARYN GORDON, JOHN STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MIN v. WILMERS et al
as 2:2013cv06747
Plaintiff:
ANGELA MIN
Defendant:
ROBERT G. WILMERS, SIMINE SEBASTIAN, PAUL G. LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
NEWTON et al v. NJ.COM et al
as 2:2013cv06415
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON, ANDREA NEWTON, QADIR NEWTON and others
Defendant:
NJ.COM, JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE 1-13 and ROBERT ROE AND MARY ROE 14-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHAPPELL v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2013cv05287
Plaintiff:
CINDY SHAPPELL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, SHAWN B. SHEEKEY and JOHN DOE OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
