Cases 21 - 30 of 2,547
Miller v. Hudson
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
John Holsen Miller
Defendant:
George Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pointer v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pointer
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Ron O'Brian, Michael Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Hatten v. Elkin et al
as 2:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Arlene F. Hatten
Defendant:
Tom Elkin, John Hinton, Davis Homer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Amato v. Mr. Cooper Mortgage
as 1:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Jessica M. Amato and John Prokop
Defendant:
Mr. Cooper Mortgage, Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper originally named as Mr. Cooper Mortgage and Does 1 through 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duke's K9 Dash N' Splash, LLC et al. v. Zizka et al.
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Duke's K9 Dash N' Splash, LLC and Michelle Filler
Defendant:
John Zizka, Roy Martin, Laura Chartier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelps v. Tekulve et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jimica D Phelps
Defendant:
Mark J Tekulve, Barbara Wiedenbein, Zach Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
