Cases 21 - 30 of 195
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
MAINARDI v. TOWNSHIP OF MAPLEWOOD et al
as 2:2022cv05247
Plaintiff:
LISA MAINARDI
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MAPLEWOOD, JERRY GIAMIS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
ZELECHIWSKY et al v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2022cv04994
Plaintiff:
BOHDAN J. ZELECHIWSKY and LISA A. ZELECHIWSKY
Defendant:
TROOPER ASHLEY DAVIS and TROOPER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
MARCHISOTTO v. DALEY et al
as 3:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
ROGER W. DALEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT TRUST FUND UNIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MULLINGS v. RAGHNAL et al
as 2:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
WESLEY-KEITH: MULLINGS
Defendant:
HARRIET ELAINE RAGHNAL, AISHA MARGARET SMITH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURRAY-NOLAN v. RUBIN, et al
as 2:2022cv00801
Defendant:
GWYNETH K. MURRAY-NOLAN, SCOTT RUBIN, KURT PETSCHOW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
HONE v. THORNTON et al
as 3:2021cv19285
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HONE
Defendant:
LISA THORNTON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
