Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bryant v. Gibson et al
as 1:2012cv02707
Plaintiff:
Maurice Bryant
Defendant:
David Gibson , Gordon Holmes, Michael Rasberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarett v. Mahoning Valley Law Enforcement Task Force
as 4:2011cv01022
Plaintiff:
Maurice Clarett
Defendant:
Mahoning Valley Law Enforcement Task Force and Unidentified Agents Assigned to Mahoning Valley Law Enforcement Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Pressley et al
as 2:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
Maurice Stewart
Defendant:
Michael Pressley , Pamela Morrison , Sharon Converse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rhoades v. Cuyahoga County Commissioners et al
as 1:2008cv01969
Plaintiff:
Maurice Rhoades
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Commissioners, Jimmy DiMora, Timothy F. Hagan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lightborne Publishing, Inc. v. Citizens for Community Values et al
as 1:2008cv00464
Plaintiff:
Lightborne Publishing, Inc., Lightborne Publishing, Inc. and Lightborne Publishing, Inc.
Defendant:
Citizens for Community Values, Phil Burress, Simon Leis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rhoades v. Hammeed et al.
as 1:2008cv01445
Plaintiff:
Maurice Rhoades
Defendant:
Akil Hammeed, Felicia Hameed and F.A.S.S. Management & Consulting
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. City of Dayton, Ohio et al
as 3:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Dayton, Ohio, Anita M. Hauser, Maurice Louderback and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
