Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02779
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Maione et al v. Medical Answering Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv08106
Plaintiff:
Scott Maione and Tasha Ostler
Defendant:
Medical Answering Services, LLC , Howard A. Zucker , Samuel D. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles et al v. ACS Kings et al
as 1:2016cv06589
Defendant:
ACS Kings, All ACS Staff in the Office, CPS Brooker Clover and others
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Charles and Pierre-Gesner Jean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles et al v. ACS Kings et al
as 1:2016cv06689
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Charles and Pierre-Gesner Jean
Defendant:
ACS Kings, Tracy Nicole, Brooker Clover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States Attorney et al v. Maxwell
as 1:2016cv02086
Defendant:
Jerome Maxwell
Plaintiff:
United States Attorney and People of The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv02317
Defendant:
P.O. Christop Alvarado, City of New York and Police Officers John Doe 1-2
Plaintiff:
Clifford Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxwell v. Hoke et al
as 1:2015cv02368
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Maxwell
Defendant:
Catherine Hoke, Louis Kanganis, Annah Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maxwell v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Milford Maxwell
Defendant:
The City Of New York, John Yu, Franklin Pineada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
