Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Mosley et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04560
Defendant:
City of New York and Officers "John Doe"
Plaintiff:
Joel Forney and Cedric Mosley
Tax 3926806:
Detective Maureen Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wajer v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03617
Plaintiff:
Glenda Wajer
Defendant:
City of New York , James Mooney and Hough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
Higgins v. Simberkoff et al
as 1:2012cv08160
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Higgins
Defendant:
Simberkoff, Lev Poberesky, Emily B. Kalb and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Moore v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv07771
Plaintiff:
Alfred Moore
Defendant:
The City of New York , Salvatore Bellomo, Dennis Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04442
Plaintiff:
Helen Brown and Laura Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of New York, David Courtien, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
More v. Mills et al
as 3:2011cv00545
Plaintiff:
James W. More
Defendant:
Thomas Mills, John Doe #1, John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mooney v. Feldman et al
as 1:2011cv02234
Defendant:
Charles Feldman, John Does 1-5 and Christopher Owen
Plaintiff:
John Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reeves v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01057
Defendant:
City Of New York, John and Jane Dow 1 through 10 and Dennis Mooney
Plaintiff:
Robert Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
