Civil Rights Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
SHABBIR v. MOUNT HOLLY TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2011cv06786
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD SHABBIR
Defendant: MOUNT HOLLY TOWNSHIP , FRANK PALLANTEE , SAMUEL DEWITT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HALEY v. THE KINTOCK GROUP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv05606
Plaintiff: CLARENCE HALEY
Defendant: THE KINTOCK GROUP, ROBERT T. LATIMER, MD, DOMINIC FORTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMAROTA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv03783
Plaintiff: DREW CAMAROTA, SR.
Defendant: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2011cv03441
Plaintiff: CHARLES IBN MUHAMMAD
Defendant: NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY, KEITH KINARD, JANET ABRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff: ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant: KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLACKSON v. PARRY et al
as 1:2010cv06390
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD BLACKSON
Defendant: KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2009cv03012
Plaintiff: AZIZAH MUHAMMAD
Defendant: RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, RIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01670
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01670
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?