Cases 21 - 30 of 39
BUDZASH v. QUINTON TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2017cv05165
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. BUDZASH
Defendant:
QUINTON TOWNSHIP, DONNA BRADWAY, ROBERT SCHMID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD et al
as 3:2017cv05110
Plaintiff:
EVERINA POWELL
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT, GLENN ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC et al
as 1:2016cv08980
Plaintiff:
TERRELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RADLINGER et al v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER et al
as 1:2016cv04778
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE RADLINGER and STUART GOLDMAN
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER, GLOUCESTER COUNTY, WILLIAM LOMBARDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BHATT v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2016cv03715
Plaintiff:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant:
AT&T INC., COLLABERA INC., MICHAEL CHIRICO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ESTATE OF CLAYTON SMITH et al v. CITY OF WILDWOOD et al
as 1:2016cv00925
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF CLAYTON SMITH and LIUDMILA SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF WILDWOOD, JAMES NEILL, LOUIS RANISZEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ARISTEO v. RAINES et al
as 1:2015cv04115
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
JODY RAINES, WEBMARCOM LLC, MICHELE MOKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARISTEO v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv00769
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, JODY RAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
