Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Marcus Stewart v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv07739
Plaintiff:
Marcus Stewart
Defendant:
FNU Roman, Sheila Mitchell, Los Angeles County Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle v. Cardall et al
as 2:2018cv02035
Defendant:
Cindy McDonald, Brent Cardall, Sandy Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pringle v. Cardall et al
as 2:2018at01231
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Defendant:
Brent Cardall, County of Yolo, Yolo County Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Straughter et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2018cv03651
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department, Allen Nance and others
Plaintiff:
Tureko Straughter and K. R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018at00121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bellotti v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv01981
Plaintiff:
Gary Vincent Bellotti
Defendant:
Richard Williams, Placer County Probation Department and Placer County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ariana Amore v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv05207
Defendant:
Oscar Calderon, Jr., Los Angeles County Probation Department, Does 1 to 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Ariana Amore
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Kim Adams v. County of Kern et al
as 1:2017cv00464
Plaintiff:
Kim Adams
Defendant:
County of Kern, Kern County Probation Department, David M Kuge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
raseknia et al
as 8:2017cv00262
Movant:
county of los angeles, county of los angeles probation department and joe raseknia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
