Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv16153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv11693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HECHT v. EAST BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2018cv06039
Plaintiff:
DARA HECHT
Defendant:
EAST BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATION , MICHAEL GASKELL , MARGARET HAAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISCHER v. SUMMIT NJ POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv04419
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL FISCHER
Defendant:
SUMMIT NJ POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEITH KWIATEK and FRANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANTONELLI v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2017cv06383
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE ANTONELLI
Defendant:
EBONY RUSSELL and THE DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY GLOUCESTER EAST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANTONELLI v. THE DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv05519
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE ANTONELLI
Defendant:
THE DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES and EBONY RUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. REIMAN et al
as 2:2017cv04313
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL STEWART
Defendant:
JOSEPH REIMAN, BOROUGH OF CARTERET, NEW JERSEY , JOHN DOES I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 3:2017cv03605
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, RUSSELL CURLEY and RYAN TIGHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FINNEMAN v. KENNEDY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2017cv00313
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMAN
Defendant:
KENNEDY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, RUSSELL HARTMAN, P.A. and KRISTY MEGLINO, R.N.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
