Cases 21 - 30 of 139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
UnifySCC et al v. Cody et al
as 5:2022cv01019
Plaintiff:
UnifySCC, Tom Davis and Maria Ramirez
Defendant:
Sara H. Cody, James Williams, Jeffrey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Floyd v. Santa Clara Department of Correction et al
as 3:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Michael Devin Floyd
Defendant:
Santa Clara Department of Correction, County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv07920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PS) Rigor v. Santa Clara County Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2021cv02131
Plaintiff:
Soraya Maria Rigor
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Public Defenders Office and Sacramento Regional Transit District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Santa Clara County Valley Medical Hospital et al
as 5:2021cv03011
Defendant:
Rite Aid Inc, Walgreens Inc, The United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oster et al v. State of California et al
as 5:2020cv07828
Defendant:
Judge Julie Emede, Murat Ozgur, Judge Beth McGowan and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Oster and Kathia Portuguez Oster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv07208
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv04781
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
