Cases 21 - 30 of 132
Odquina v. Honolulu County, et al
as 1:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Edward Odquina
Defendant:
Honolulu County and Holly T. Shikada
Counter Claimant:
City and County of Honolulu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yukutake v. Shikada
as 1:2022cv00323
Plaintiff:
Todd Yukutake and Justin Solomon
Defendant:
Holly T. Shikada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Braz v. Cotton et al
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Uini Braz
Defendant:
Attorney Jason L. Cotton, Attorney Sun Young Park, Attorney Peter T. Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santucci v. City and County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Michael Santucci
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu and Holly T. Shikada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fukuda v. Chang et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Defendant:
Sonia Nakada, Justice Gary W. B. Chang, Former Justice Patrick Border and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Fukuda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Yellen v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Mike Yellen
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Governor David Ige, Officer T. Aurello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
