Cases 21 - 30 of 141
VAUGHN:DOUCE v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY et al
as 3:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
OLIVER VAUGHN:DOUCE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DIVISION CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, MADELIN F. EINBINDER, KERI POPKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv18746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv17091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv13335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BRETT v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2021cv12992
Defendant:
MR. WHEELER, ROBERT RULBERELL, JUDGE GOLDBER and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARANTE et al v. KELEMEN et al
as 2:2021cv13013
Plaintiff:
NO PLACE INN, INC. (d/b/a Buddys Place), BUDDYS REALTY, CO., JOSEPH MARANTE and others
Defendant:
MARY ELLEN MURPHY, CONSUELO CARPENTER, ROBERT ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUSCHETTO v. RIVER et al
as 3:2021cv12742
Counter Claimant:
ADAM C WORTH, CHIEF MITCHELL A. LITTLE and TOMS RIVER
Counter Defendant:
MICHAEL FUSCHETTO
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 6-10 and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOUZONE et al v. AHLERT et al
as 2:2021cv11697
Defendant:
SGT. BRIAN AHLERT, LT. PHIL D'ALESSIO, CITY OF FLORHAM PARK and others
Plaintiff:
OMAYRA DIAZ and KASSIM MOUZONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REIMER v. UNITED STATES SENATE et al
as 2:2021cv10997
Defendant:
BEN SASSE, SUSAN COLLINS, MIKE ROUNDS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J REIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER
as 3:2021cv04633
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
