Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Austin v. UC Health et al
as 1:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Desiree Austin
Defendant:
UC Health and Daniel Drake Center for Post-Acute Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. Hodges et al
as 1:2014cv00867
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region
Defendant:
Richard Hodges , University of Cincinnati Medical Center, LLC and UC Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amar Gueye v. UC Health, et al
as 14-4103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMAR GUEYE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOINT COMMISSION, ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, and all UC Health Insurance Carriers, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amar Gueye v. UC Health, et al
as 14-3478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMAR GUEYE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOINT COMMISSION, ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, and all UC Health Insurance Carriers, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Gueye v. UC Health et al
as 1:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
Amar Gueye
Defendant:
UC Health , Joint Commission, Ace Property & Casualty Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
