Cases 21 - 30 of 386
DOE v. ROWAN UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv20657
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
ROWAN UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY GREESON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
HARRIS v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 1:2023cv20449
Plaintiff:
RONRAY HARRIS
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE RUTGERS, MONICA TSAKIRIS, DR. RAYMOND MALTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
DODSON v. UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2023cv04234
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, AMBULATORY CARE SERVICES and ORAL MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY & DENTAL PRACTICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIAMONTE v. HENDERSON et al
as 2:2023cv03596
Plaintiff:
MARIA DIAMONTE
Defendant:
Taja Nia Henderson, Kim Perry, Gary Farnese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
OKOGUN v. MILLER et al
as 3:2023cv02640
Plaintiff:
ENOMEN JOHN OKOGUN
Defendant:
LUKE MILLER, CORPORAL DAVID TRICOCHE, ALI ALI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
