Cases 21 - 30 of 32
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY et al
as 2:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
THEODORA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY , E. J. MCDONALD , DAVID FORMENZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMLIN v. THE CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2011cv04587
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TOMLIN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROLANDO RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LEARY v. PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv04514
Plaintiff:
ANGEL M. LEARY
Defendant:
PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PAUL MICCINILLI, JEFFERY HUNTINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAPP v. PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv04267
Plaintiff:
JASON SAPP
Defendant:
PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PAUL MICCINILLI, JEFFERY HUNTINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAEZ v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY et al
as 2:2010cv03685
Plaintiff:
ANTRIZ BAEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY , PERTH AMBOY POLICE DEPARTMENT , GILBERTO SIMAO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMLIN v. THE CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2010cv03523
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TOMLIN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, R. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2004cv05317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PUMPHREY v. PEREKSTA et al
as 3:2008cv05679
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT PUMPHREY
Defendant:
DARLENE J. PEREKSTA, J.S.C, EDWARD A. BELMONT, A. GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv05615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
