Cases 21 - 30 of 120
Johnson v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2021cv02707
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronics Registration System, Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Mers and others
Plaintiff:
Monzella Yohanus Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Rogers v. Hacker et al
as 3:2020cv01116
Plaintiff:
Mr William R. Rogers and William R. Rogers
Defendant:
Brad Wells and Gregory Hacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southshore Restore et al v. Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation et al
as 1:2020cv05264
Defendant:
Brett Bender, Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation and As-Yet Unknown Defendants
Plaintiff:
Southshore Restore, Heartland Greens, Botavi Wellness LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKenzie v. The United States
as 3:2020cv50249
Plaintiff:
Victoria C. McKenzie
Defendant:
The United States, Jaclyn Rogers, Stephen E. Balogh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Aunt Martha's Health and Wellness, Inc. v. Village of Midlothian, Illinois
as 1:2020cv02861
Defendant:
Village of Midlothian, Illinois
Plaintiff:
Aunt Martha's Health and Wellness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Alvarez v. Wells Global West, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv07608
Defendant:
Craig Rehkopf and Wells Global West, LLC
Plaintiff:
Francisco Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03695
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
