Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Lawrence v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2016cv00169
Petitioner:
Kenneth J Lawrence
Respondent:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinch v. Clayton County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2016cv02781
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tinch
Defendant:
Clayton County Board of Commissioners, Jeffrey E. Turner, Eldrin Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cunningham et al v. City of Smyrna et al
as 1:2015cv01523
Plaintiff:
James D. Cunningham and Jeff C. Crawford
Defendant:
City of Smyrna, Max Bacon, Jimmy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al
as 2:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Marvin B. Smith, III and Sharon H. Smith
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, S. Andrew Shuping Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyd v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Heard v. Wells Fargo Banks et al
as 2:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Banks, Quicken Loans, Anhphuc D. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stone et al v. Popular Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02685
Plaintiff:
Christine Stone, David Kevin Shanyfelt, Jeanette P. Bowen and others
Defendant:
Popular Inc., Popular ABS, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon and others
Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv02452
Plaintiff:
Wanette M. Jones
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and McCalla Raymer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
