Cases 381 - 390 of 6,780
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
McCaigue et al v. Edwards et al
as 2:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
Shawn McCaigue and Kathleen McCaigue
Defendant:
Brandon Edwards, Carrie Peters, City of Appleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pelishek v. City of Sheboygan et al
as 2:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Chad Pelishek
Defendant:
City of Sheboygan, Ryan Sorenson, Barbara Felde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Wisconsin v. Derksen
as 2:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
State of Wisconsin
Defendant:
Roy Charles Derksen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Vega v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development et al
as 2:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Pablito Vega
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, Adjudicator 4318, Rohit Rangarajan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pitts v. Racine County WI
as 2:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Douglas Richard Pitts
Defendant:
Racine County WI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Richmond v. United States Government et al
as 2:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Richmond
Defendant:
United States Government and Milwaukee Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
