Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Jarrell Rayvon Allen v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2019cv00153
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Riverside Sheriff Department, DEPUTY JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JARRELL RAYVON ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Edgar Ibarra Mendoza v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv10561
Defendant:
Jonathan Rocha, DOES 1-10 Inclusive and DOES 1-10, inclusive
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Lopez and CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Plaintiff:
Edgar Ibarra Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose J Gonsalez v. Employment Development Department EDD et al
as 2:2018cv08607
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Employment Development Department EDD, Myra Ibarra and others
Plaintiff:
Jose J. Gonsalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary H. Garcia et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2018cv00839
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Toro, Phillip J. Garcia, Mary H. Garcia and others
Defendant:
Daniel Anes, Stanley Sniff, Joseph Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017at00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Natia Sampson v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 5:2017cv00599
Defendant:
Philip L. Browning, Philip L. Browning, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Natia Sampson
Natia Sampson v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv02414
Defendant:
Philip L. Browning, Philip L. Browning, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Natia Sampson
Salinas-Ibarra v. Ellis
as 5:2017cv01137
Plaintiff:
Ubelino Salinas-Ibarra
Defendant:
Jaime Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
