Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Obi v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2010cv05147
Plaintiff:
Innocent Obi
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Pierce & Associates, Daniel Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00734
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Gulley v. Pierce and Associates et al
as 1:2010cv00573
Plaintiff:
Victor Gulley
Defendant:
Pierce and Associates, Codilis & Associates, PC and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Crawford v. Lindorff-Mathes et al
as 1:2009cv01139
Plaintiff:
Tina I Crawford
Defendant:
Lois Lindorff-Mathes, Patricia A Smith, Rose Pogue and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pierce v. City of Chicago Illinois et al
as 1:2009cv01462
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pierce and Marvin Pierce
Defendant:
City of Chicago Illinois and Officer Stuckert
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McReynolds et al v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv06105
Plaintiff:
George McReynolds, Maroc Howard, Frankie Ross and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
