Cases 31 - 40 of 1,856
Raven's Landing, LLC et al v. New York State Cannabis Control Board et al
as 1:2024cv01874
Plaintiff:
RAVEN'S LANDING, LLC d/b/a DR. NATURE RX, HEMPED NYC, LLC, HIDDEN HEMP CORP. and others
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE CANNABIS CONTROL BOARD, NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CANNABIS MANAGEMENT, CHRIS ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Godbold v. Field et al
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Marshall Godbold
Defendant:
Newell B. Field and Patrick McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
