Cases 31 - 40 of 776
CAI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
XIULING CAI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.C. v. DUVERNA et al
as 1:2023cv02204
Plaintiff:
SHERINA BROWN and J.C.
Defendant:
JAMSLY DUVERNA, JOHN DOES 1-10 and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ZIMMERMAN v. ZUCKERBERG et al
as 1:2023cv02139
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
MARK ZUCKERBERG, META PLATFORMS, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BUTLER v. JOHN
as 1:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM N. BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STRIPLIN v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
AARON WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Not Classified By Court:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JEFF SESSIONS, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. and others
Defendant:
Band Bank Ltd, SQUATTER, PETER NEWSHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
STRIPLIN v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
AAREN STRIPLIN and AARON WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., KAMALA HARRIS, ROBERT MUELLER and others
BLACKMON, JR v. CITY OF D'IBERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
LARRY LAVON BLACKMON, JR
Defendant:
CITY OF D'IBERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, D'IBERVILLE CITY COURT, SHAUNTA BALLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
