Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Montana Caregivers Association, LLC et al v. The United States of America et al
as 9:2011cv00074
Plaintiff:
Montana Caregivers Association, LLC , Christopher W. Williams , MCM Caregivers, Inc. and others
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Little Nest v. Russell et al
as 1:2008cv00008
Plaintiff:
Chesco Little Nest
Defendant:
Majel M. Russell, Urban Bear Don't Walk, William Watt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christison et al v. Lewis and Clark County, et al
as 6:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jerry Christison and Genevieve Christison
Defendant:
Lewis and Clark County, Edward M. Tinsley, Michael A. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tanke v. Chertoff
as 6:2007cv00062
Plaintiff:
Anne M. Tanke and Anne M. Tanke
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Custer Battlefield Preservation Committee et al
as 1:2007cv00090
Plaintiff:
Janice M. Smith
Defendant:
Custer Battlefield Preservation Committee, Harold Stanton, Mrs. Harold Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
