Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Buhannic v. NY Appeal Court 1st District et al
as 1:2019cv01132
Defendant:
NY Appeal Court 1st District, Susanna Molina Rojas and Chief Clerk Dan Ramos
Plaintiff:
Philippe Buhannic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01435
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Molina v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv07486
Defendant:
City of New York, Detective John Doe #1 and Detective John Doe #2
Plaintiff:
Felix Molina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv05798
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, Sgt. Diogenes Loveras and others
Plaintiff:
Rashun Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strobert v. ATF et al
as 1:2016cv08140
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Strobert
Defendant:
ATF, FBI, United States Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Al-Qadaffi v. New York Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv05422
Plaintiff:
Wajid Kahlil Al-Qadaffi
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Jonathan Molina and New York Police Department
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, NYC Law Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04762
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
