Cases 31 - 40 of 348
Sherman v. Johnson et al
as 5:2022cv01309
Plaintiff:
Latasha Sherman
Defendant:
Karen P Johnson, C P Commercial Properties L L C, Mackey Lane Properties L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prisco v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
Randi Prisco and Randi Nicole Prisco
Defendant:
Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Isaac Hughes, Johnathan Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Death)
Jamison v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Arlington Jamison
Defendant:
Joseph P. Lopinto, III, C. Fritts, S. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Kahrs, et al
as 2:2021cv02280
Plaintiff:
Shavonda Brooks, on behalf of minor child, A.B. and Shavonda Brooks
Defendant:
Brian Kahrs, Cherie W Blanchard, Joseph P Lopinto, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. J P Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 5:2021cv04207
Plaintiff:
Kareem Johnson
Defendant:
Deon Morris, L L P, J P Morgan Chase Bank and Deon Morris L L P
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reese v. Ruffin et al
as 2:2022cv00124
Not Classified By Court:
Jonathan D. Bentel
Plaintiff:
Wadnisha Reese
Defendant:
Michelle Ruffin, Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Patrick Blanchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv04163
Plaintiff:
Andrenique Howard
Defendant:
Corleon Davis, Corleon Phillips, Corleon Milles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
