Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Parnell v. Attorney General State of Texas
as 4:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Terry Gale Parnell
Defendant:
Attorney General State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Harper and Katrina Wansley
Defendant:
Mike Lee, Joe Rifby, Unknown Arresting Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Reyes et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2009cv00183
Plaintiff:
Gay Lynn Reyes and R.A.H.
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Mississippi, Mississippi Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flowers v. Hinds County Sheriff Department ET, AL et al
as 3:2009cv00564
Plaintiff:
Willie Flowers
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff Department ET, AL, Attorney Craig L. Slay, Police Officer Cedar Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDowell v. Hinds County Court House Administration et al
as 3:2008cv00574
Plaintiff:
Christopher McDowell
Defendant:
Hinds County Court House Administration, Unknown Yedgar, District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fairley v. Ochsner Medical Foundation et al
as 1:2008cv00647
Plaintiff:
Yori Henry Fairley
Defendant:
Ochsner Medical Foundation, Vincent Adolph, Richelle Monier and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. AMFED Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00271
Plaintiff:
T. James Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
AMFED Companies, Inc., The State of Mississippi, The Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Barbour et al
as 3:2007cv00224
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lee
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, Eric Clark, Mississippi Tax Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
