Civil Rights Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Samples v. Chapman et al
as 4:2011cv00153
Plaintiff: Stanley Lamar Samples
Defendant: Sharon Chapman, Rachel Deems, Rosemary Heidmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handy v. Cook et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00271
Plaintiff: Mark Handy
Defendant: Tina Cook, Cooper Cook, Kenneth Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atwood v. Chapman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00016
Plaintiff: Amber Jene Atwood
Defendant: Tom Chapman, Connie Rouse and Linden Rozier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Great Outdoor Advertising Inc v. City of Loganville Georgia et al
as 3:2009cv00054
Plaintiff: Great Outdoor Advertising Inc and Great Outdoor Advertising Inc
Defendant: City of Loganville Georgia and M Patricia Chapman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Handy v. City of Macon et al
as 5:2008cv00425
Plaintiff: Mark Handy
Defendant: City of Macon, Mike Burns, Kenneth Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights Both
Lowrey v. Walton County Sheriff's Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00121
Plaintiff: Anthony Blake Lowrey
Defendant: Walton County Sheriff's Department, Joe Chapman, Captain Etchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis et al v. Medows et al
as 4:2007cv00167
Plaintiff: Jamie Ellis, Jennifer Larios, Shameekia Johnson and others
Defendant: Rhonda Medows, WellCare of Georgia Inc., Peach State Health Plan Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Kool Smiles P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crowe v. Wilcox et al
as 3:2007cv00074
Plaintiff: Nathan Adam Crowe, Nathan Adam Crowe, Nathan Adam Crowe and others
Defendant: Thomas R. Wilcox, Thomas R. Wilcox, Walton County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?