Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Cariker, et al v. Ok City Police Department, et al
as 13-6127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOLLY CARIKER, individually and COURTNEY CROSSFIELD, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY and JOSEPH FRANK, individually
Galbreath v. The City of Oklahoma City, et al
as 12-6295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN GALBREATH
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY and KEVIN PARTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-6107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moore v. City of Oklahoma City, et al
as 12-6022
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WESLEY T. MOORE
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL GODSIL
Defendant:
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY
Wilson v. City of Oklahoma City, et al
as 11-6282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tubbs, et al v. Harrison, et al
as 11-6037
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES KELLY TUBBS and TAMMY LYNN TUBBS
Defendant - Appellant:
JEREMY HARRISON and TIMOTHY MUNZY
Defendant:
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, a political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma
Tubbs, et al v. Harrison, et al
as 11-6036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES KELLY TUBBS and TAMMY LYNN TUBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEREMY HARRISON, TIMOTHY MUNZY and CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, a political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma
McCarty v. Gilchrist, et al
as 09-6220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS EDWARD MCCARTY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOYCE A. GILCHRIST, in her official capacity, WILLIAM CITTY, Chief of Police, City of OK Oklahoma City, in his official capacity and CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY
Wilson v. City of Oklahoma City, et al
as 09-6209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, COUNTY OF OKLAHOMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
