Cases 31 - 40 of 68
GONTA v. NATIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00565
Defendant:
DONALD F NATIONS, PROMENADE RENTALS LLC and MARILYN S NATIONS
Plaintiff:
BRIDGETT GONTA and BRIDGETT GONTA doing business as AQUARIUS DAY SPA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAY v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2019cv00506
Defendant:
ZACHARY WESTER and LOUIS S ROBERTS, III
Plaintiff:
TREVOR DAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01917
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barberi v. 5 DAY PLANTATION SHUTTERS INC. et al
as 0:2019cv62224
Defendant:
5 DAY PLANTATION SHUTTERS INC. and KIAS PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS LLC
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Smith v. Wyndham Hotels et al
as 3:2019cv00621
Defendant:
Baymont Elm Hill Pk, Days Inn, Slum Dog Millionaires and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAND et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2019cv00120
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAXTER, KENNETH SHAW, TYLER LAND and others
Defendant:
TREVOR LEE, SHERIFF LOUIS S ROBERTS, III, ZACHARY WESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Day et al
as 3:2019cv00402
Defendant:
Judge Lance M. Day and Athiel S. Jones
Plaintiff:
Arther Lee Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driessen v. University of Miami School of Law Children & Youth Law Clinic et al
as 1:2019cv21122
Defendant:
University of Miami School of Law Children & Youth Law Clinic and Emily C. Moises Day Training Center
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Driessen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DAYS INN et al
as 4:2019cv00114
Defendant:
WYNDHAM INTER, PATEL and DAYS INN
Plaintiff:
JAMES D SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
