Cases 31 - 40 of 90
ROUNDTREE v. TALBOT et al
as 3:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
STEFAIN M. ROUNDTREE
Defendant:
KATHRYN TALBOT, ESQ., REBECCA M. HOVEY, DEBRA J. HOROWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATWELL v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER et al
as 3:2017cv00507
Plaintiff:
LUKE ATWELL
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, VERNON ESTREICHER, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
ALLEN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY PUBLIC DEFENDER
as 1:2016cv08661
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY PUBLIC DEFENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY PUBLIC DEFENDER
as 3:2016cv08661
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY PUBLIC DEFENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKLE v. BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv05512
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BUCKLE
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY , BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE , BERGEN COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALSTON v. STOKES et al
as 2:2016cv03930
Plaintiff:
WARREN ALSTON
Defendant:
MERRY BEATRICE STOKES, JOSEPH BRUCE BENNETT, THE ESTATE OF MERRY BEATRICE "STOKES" BENNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BHATT v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2016cv03715
Plaintiff:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant:
AT&T INC., COLLABERA INC., MICHAEL CHIRICO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY et al v. PIER et al
as 2:2016cv03417
Plaintiff:
KELLY, ROBERT KELLY, M.K. and others
Defendant:
PIER, JACK BALDWIN, BRIAN DUNSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
