Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv02072
Plaintiff: Department of Fair Employment and Housing
Defendant: Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-55553
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-55176
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-15060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner-intervenor - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-15057
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner-intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Ealise Crumb v. Orthopedic Surgery Medical Gro, et al
as 08-55793
Plaintiff - Appellant: EALISE CRUMB
Defendant - Appellee: ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, doing business as Beverly Hills Orthopedic Group, REESE E. POLESKY, M.D., Inc, a California Corporation, JOSEPH ISAACSON, M.D., as an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv03747
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Joyce Marie Burgess v. Department of Fair Employment and Housing
as 2:2007cv01691
Plaintiff: Joyce Marie Burgess
Defendant: Department of Fair Employment and Housing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?